Wondering in 2014 IF Hillary Rodham Clinton

will use Obama's Campaign 2011 buses that cost Bluebird (School buses and Luxury Coaches) of America all those jobs going to Canada or spend ANOTHER 1.1 MILLION for buses and ANOTHER $2,000,000 to "pimp them out" i.e. outfit them with custom ordered-communications equipment (not CB Radios) and all the EXTRAS that would have benefited Bluebird of AMERICA with LOTS of JOBS! Background: On August 17, 2011 President Barack Obama bused in style and splendor to the first of two “town hall” destinations in west Illinois. For seeking to "steal thunder" from stumping Rick Perry and others, top national and state Republicans panned his campaign-tone, glad-handing visit and criticized his insistence upon taxpayer-funded Canadian-manufactured buses as part of a so-called "jobs tour". Obama BOUGHT two Canadian-made buses at $1.1 million plus $2 million for "modifications" i.e. "pimping them out",i.e. outfiting them with custom ordered-communications equipment and all the EXTRAS that would have benefited Bluebird of AMERICA with LOTS of JOBS! Always fund-raising and in a CAMPAIGN MODE, Obama has known he would need the buses for years. Why didn't he order them from Blue Bird Buses of LaFayette, Georgia in 2010, then talk about saving hundreds of jobs. Blue Bird laid off people who described the feeling as "blindsided", "hit in the back of the head", and "stabbed in the gut". Their rule out COULD have been due to A) no union and B) employing lots of Caucasians only a few blacks due to area demography and C) Obama not into helping Americans save their jobs. He does not give a rat's rear end about saving jobs as rebuilding America for socialism/communism involves "BUSTING USA DOWN". Apparently, the name source for Obama,s "Yes We Can" was from President George W. Bush's spring 2004 “Yes, America Can” campaign tour through the Midwest. Previously id, it leased buses and fitted them with security and communications gear, then stripped them of the equipment afterward. Apparently Obama has plans for the Canadian buses that may involve friends. Iowa comments Rick Perry directed at Federal Reserve Bank Chairman Ben Bernanke. “If this guy prints more money between now and the election, I don’t know what you all would do to him in Iowa, but we would treat him pretty ugly down in Texas,” Perry said. “Printing more money to play politics at this particular time in American history is almost treacherous—or treasonous in my opinion.” Perry was referring to what is called quantitative easing (or QE in Beltway wonk speak), in which a central bank creates new electronic money to buy corporate and government debt in an effort to lower borrowing costs. The U.S. has already conducted two rounds of QE and several top investors and analysts have predicted that the Fed will embark on a third round later this year, the Guardian notes. “We’ve already tried this,” Perry added at the backyard campaign event. “All it’s going to be doing is devaluing the dollar in your pocket and we cannot afford that. We have to learn the lessons of the past three years that they’ve been devastating. The president of the United States has conducted an experiment on the American economy for almost the last three years, and it has gone tragically wrong and we need to send him a clear message in November of 2012 that new leadership is coming.” ABC News reporter posed a follow up question with the GOP next POTUS after the Iowa event to clarify if Rick Perry thought that the Federal Reserve was playing politics to deliberately attempt to help a desperate-for-re-election-and-finishing-off-the-USA-Obama. Perry stated: “If they print more money between now and this election, I would suggest that’s exactly what’s going on.” Talk show icons refer to Obama's as "Magical Misery Tour" in direct reference to Obama's lack of success as POTUS. has chosen two Canadian-made buses at $1.1 million plus $2 million for "modifications" i.e. "pimping them out". Always fund-raising and in a CAMPAIGN MODE, Obama has known he would need the buses for years. Why didn't he order them from Blue Bird Buses of LaFayette, Georgia last year, then talk about saving hundreds of jobs. Blue Bird laid off people who described the feeling as "blindsided", "hit in the back of the head", and "stabbed in the gut". Their rule out COULD have been due to A) no union and B) all Caucasians and C) Obama not into helping Americans save their jobs. He does not give a rat's rear end about saving jobs as rebuilding America for socialism/communism involves "BUSTING USA DOWN". Apparently, the name source for Obama,s "Yes We Can" was from President George W. Bush's spring 2004 “Yes, America Can” campaign tour through the Midwest. Previously id, it leased buses and fitted them with security and communications gear, then stripped them of the equipment afterward. Apparently Obama has plans for the Canadian buses that may involve friends. Iowa comments Rick Perry directed at Federal Reserve Bank Chairman Ben Bernanke. “If this guy prints more money between now and the election, I don’t know what you all would do to him in Iowa, but we would treat him pretty ugly down in Texas,” Perry said. “Printing more money to play politics at this particular time in American history is almost treacherous—or treasonous in my opinion.” Perry was referring to what is called quantitative easing (or QE in Beltway wonk speak), in which a central bank creates new electronic money to buy corporate and government debt in an effort to lower borrowing costs. The U.S. has already conducted two rounds of QE and several top investors and analysts have predicted that the Fed will embark on a third round later this year, the Guardian notes. “We’ve already tried this,” Perry added at the backyard campaign event. “All it’s going to be doing is devaluing the dollar in your pocket and we cannot afford that. We have to learn the lessons of the past three years that they’ve been devastating. The president of the United States has conducted an experiment on the American economy for almost the last three years, and it has gone tragically wrong and we need to send him a clear message in November of 2012 that new leadership is coming.” ABC News reporter posed a follow up question with the GOP next POTUS after the Iowa event to clarify if Rick Perry thought that the Federal Reserve was playing politics to deliberately attempt to help a desperate-for-re-election-and-finishing-off-the-USA-Obama. Perry stated: “If they print more money between now and this election, I would suggest that’s exactly what’s going on.” Talk show icons refer to Obama's as "Magical Misery Tour" in direct reference to Obama's lack of success as POTUS. A Youtuber (sounds like a spud but maybe a spud gunner) labeled this video segment as "PERRY GETS VICIOUS" and another labeled identical 0.49 clip as "Perry threatens Bernake HD" The controversy, arising out of the drone war, that President Obama has the authority to assassinate US citizens abroad in non-war zones just got even more disgraceful. The Obama administration’s Attorney General Eric Holder sent a letter in response to persistent inquiries from Senator Rand Paul, who vowed to block the confirmation of John Brennan to CIA chief if the White House didn’t respond. In the letter, Holder maintains that the President does have the authority to kill US citizens on US soil without any due process. “It is possible, I suppose, to imagine an extraordinary circumstance in which it would be necessary and appropriate under the Constitution and applicable laws of the United States for the President to authorize the military to use lethal force within the territory of the United States,” Holder wrote. Holder’s caveat is that this scenario is “entirely hypothetical” because “the US government has not carried out drone strikes in the United States and has no intention of doing so.” Furthermore, “as a policy matter…we reject the use of military force where well-established law enforcement authorities in this country provide the best means for incapacitating a terrorist threat.” Still, the concluding legal opinion represents a radical betrayal of constitutional limits imposed on the state for depriving citizens of life, liberty and property. Officially now, Obama’s kingly authority to play Judge, Jury, and Executioner and deprive Americans of their life without due process of law applies not only to Americans abroad but to citizens that are inside the United States. “The US Attorney General’s refusal to rule out the possibility of drone strikes on American citizens and on American soil is more than frightening – it is an affront the Constitutional due process rights of all Americans,” Sen. Paul said in a statement. Holder, along with the Obama administration, is making it seem as if the President’s use of lethal force, as in the drone war, would only be used in circumstances like another impending 9/11 attack or something. Only when an attack is imminent. But that categorical limitation on the President’s authority to kill depends upon their definition of “imminence,” which we learned from a leaked Justice Department white paper last month, is extremely broad. The memo refers to what it calls a “broader concept of imminence” than what has traditionally been required, like actual intelligence of an ongoing plot against the US. “The condition that an operational leader present an ‘imminent’ threat of violent attack against the United States does not require the United States to have clear evidence that a specific attack on U.S. persons and interests will take place in the immediate future,” the memo states, contradicting conventional international law. Instead, so long as an “informed, high-level” US official claims the targeted American has been “recently” involved in “activities” that pose a threat and “there is no evidence suggesting that he has renounced or abandoned such activities,” then the President can order his assassination. The memo does not define “recently” or “activities.” Holder also insists that in the case of such “extraordinary circumstances,” like another impending 9/11, he “would examine the particular facts and circumstances before advising the president of the scope of his authority.” Boy, do I feel comforted. #################################################### http://ktla.com/2013/02/12/read-christopher-dorners-so-called-manifesto/ from "Kiss This L.A. (KTLA)" vilified by the LAPD and the media. Unfortunately, this is a necessary evil that I do not enjoy but must partake and complete for substantial change to occur within the LAPD and reclaim my name. The department has not changed since the Rampart and Rodney King days. It has gotten worse. The consent decree should never have been lifted. The only thing that has evolved from the consent decree is those officers involved in the Rampart scandal and Rodney King incidents have since promoted to supervisor, commanders, and command staff, and executive positions. The question is, what would you do to clear your name? Name; A word or set of words by which a person, animal, place, or thing is known, addressed, or referred to. Name Synonyms; reputation, title, appellation, denomination, repute. A name is more than just a noun, verb, or adjective. It’s your life, your legacy, your journey, sacrifices, and everything you’ve worked hard for every day of your life as and adolescent, young adult and adult. Don’t let anybody tarnish it when you know you’ve live up to your own set of ethics and personal ethos. In 8/07 I reported an officer (Ofcr. XXXX/now a Sergeant), for kicking a suspect (excessive force) during a Use of Force while I was assigned as a patrol officer at LAPD’s Harbor Division. While cuffing the suspect, (XXXX), XXXX kicked the suspect twice in the chest and once in the face. The kick to the face left a visible injury on the left cheek below the eye. Unfortunately after reporting it to supervisors and investigated by PSB (internal affairs investigator Det. XXXX), nothing was done. I had broken their supposed “Blue Line”. Unfortunately, It’s not JUST US, it’s JUSTICE!!! In fact, 10 months later on 6/25/08, after already successfully completing probation, acquiring a basic Post Certificate, and Intermediate Post Certificate, I was relieved of duty by the LAPD while assigned to patrol at Southwest division. It is clear as day that the department retaliated toward me for reporting XXXX for kicking Mr. XXXX. The department stated that I had lied and made up the report that XXXX had kicked the suspect.